Sangal Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

18

0

-8

73

3:2

2

0

5.4

-24%

10

14

2

-4

50

3:3

2

0

5.1

-20%

10

16

0

-6

55

1:3

3

0

4.7

-21%

7

17

3

-10

58

1:2

1

0

4.6

-29%

2

17

3

-15

35

0:2

0

0

3.3

-54%

Total

39

82

8

-43

272

8:12

8

0

4.6

-30%

Akuma Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

7

1

+14

96

3:1

7

0

7.7

+30%

19

9

6

+10

96

3:2

4

1

7.5

+40%

14

6

3

+8

77

1:0

4

0

6.4

+26%

14

8

5

+6

86

1:2

5

0

6.3

+17%

13

11

4

+2

83

4:3

2

0

6.2

+15%

Total

81

41

19

+40

439

12:8

22

1

6.8

+26%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs Akuma by the Bo3.gg Team

Akuma on Inferno Analysis

Akuma demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Akuma on Inferno were SENSEi, who contributed 21 kills, and j3kie, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8773 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Akuma held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno included paz, who contributed 10 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5436 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent Akuma from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date