Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

14

7

+6

86

3:1

6

0

7.0

+16%

16

13

3

+3

69

2:2

5

0

6.2

+2%

15

13

3

+2

54

0:4

4

1

5.7

-3%

13

16

6

-3

66

3:5

3

0

5.5

-5%

10

16

4

-6

51

2:2

1

0

5.0

-25%

Total

74

72

23

+2

327

10:14

19

1

5.9

-3%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

18

4

+3

89

4:3

5

0

6.6

+14%

15

12

5

+3

73

4:1

5

0

6.4

+8%

15

18

4

-3

82

3:2

5

0

6.1

-7%

13

13

3

0

49

3:3

4

0

5.2

-14%

8

13

4

-5

42

0:1

1

0

4.7

-21%

Total

72

74

20

-2

335

14:10

20

0

5.8

-4%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sangal vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were SaMey, who contributed 20 kills, and xfl0ud, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7837 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included simke, who contributed 21 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8039 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date