SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

31

18

9

+13

98

0:3

7

0

7.0

+33%

30

21

5

+9

90

8:5

8

0

7.0

+16%

23

21

2

+2

72

2:3

5

0

6.0

+8%

19

23

6

-4

71

6:4

4

0

5.8

-6%

25

28

3

-3

73

3:2

7

0

5.8

-7%

Total

128

111

25

+17

404

19:17

31

0

6.3

+9%

AGO Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

26

5

+1

87

2:3

8

2

6.7

+10%

25

29

1

-4

69

5:2

5

0

6.0

-5%

22

24

4

-2

83

5:7

6

1

5.9

+10%

22

27

4

-5

74

4:2

4

0

5.7

-11%

14

23

5

-9

48

1:5

2

0

4.3

-25%

Total

110

129

19

-19

361

17:19

25

3

5.7

-4%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Nuke Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke were stadodo, who contributed 31 kills, and MUTiRiS, who added 30 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 13727 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AGO on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for AGO, as they managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AGO on Nuke included leman, who contributed 27 kills, and ultimate, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12277 total damage, AGO couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date