SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

18

8

+8

116

6:6

6

2

7.6

+38%

24

15

6

+9

77

2:1

8

1

6.9

+16%

19

17

2

+2

75

4:2

4

0

6.2

+9%

16

20

7

-4

79

1:1

5

1

5.8

-8%

10

18

4

-8

40

1:3

2

0

4.2

-29%

Total

95

88

27

+7

386

14:13

25

4

6.2

+5%

HAVU Scoreboard Nuke (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

20

3

+1

77

2:3

6

0

6.3

+3%

19

19

5

0

81

3:1

4

0

6.2

+2%

19

16

4

+3

55

4:1

4

0

5.9

-5%

16

20

6

-4

77

2:6

3

0

5.4

-7%

13

20

5

-7

62

2:3

3

1

5.2

-11%

Total

88

95

23

-7

352

13:14

20

1

5.8

-4%

Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Nuke Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke were MUTiRiS, who contributed 26 kills, and story, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10427 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Nuke included xseveN, who contributed 21 kills, and Banjo, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9499 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date