SAW Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

11

3

+9

120

3:1

5

1

8.7

+45%

15

11

9

+4

96

2:0

6

1

7.5

+25%

15

11

6

+4

88

2:2

4

0

7.2

+9%

13

7

0

+6

51

2:2

4

0

6.2

+5%

11

10

7

+1

65

2:2

3

0

6.1

-2%

Total

74

50

25

+24

421

11:7

22

2

7.1

+17%

RUBIK Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

15

6

-4

85

0:1

2

0

5.6

-11%

10

17

2

-7

70

4:2

3

0

5.3

-15%

9

15

1

-6

57

1:3

1

2

5.1

-28%

9

13

4

-4

58

2:2

1

0

5.0

-23%

11

14

3

-3

58

0:3

2

0

4.9

+3%

Total

50

74

16

-24

327

7:11

9

2

5.2

-15%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs RUBIK by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Anubis Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Anubis were MUTiRiS, who contributed 20 kills, and rmn, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7569 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


RUBIK on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for RUBIK, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for RUBIK on Anubis included Aaron, who contributed 11 kills, and msN, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5892 total damage, RUBIK couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, RUBIK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date