SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

13

13

0

0

66

3:5

3

0

5.7

-3%

11

16

1

-5

57

2:1

2

0

5.6

-14%

11

14

5

-3

71

0:3

2

0

5.3

-14%

7

16

2

-9

55

2:2

0

0

4.6

-36%

6

15

3

-9

35

0:1

1

0

4.1

-43%

Total

48

74

11

-26

284

7:12

8

0

5.1

-22%

Sampi Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

9

2

+11

94

4:3

6

1

8.2

+36%

12

6

4

+6

67

3:0

2

0

6.6

+12%

14

11

1

+3

77

2:0

3

0

6.5

+15%

14

13

3

+1

76

2:3

4

0

5.8

+7%

10

10

9

0

73

1:1

1

0

5.7

-2%

Total

70

49

19

+21

388

12:7

16

1

6.5

+13%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team

Sampi on Nuke Analysis

Sampi demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sampi on Nuke were ZEDKO, who contributed 20 kills, and fino, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7372 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SAW on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke included MUTiRiS, who contributed 13 kills, and rmn, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5405 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent Sampi from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date