SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

14

6

+10

105

1:1

6

0

8.0

+42%

20

15

3

+5

83

1:4

5

1

6.7

+16%

15

15

4

0

81

5:3

5

0

6.3

+4%

13

13

6

0

58

2:2

1

1

6.0

-7%

13

14

5

-1

69

2:2

2

0

5.9

0%

Total

85

71

24

+14

396

11:12

19

2

6.6

+11%

Sangal Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

17

10

0

92

4:2

4

0

6.8

+8%

15

18

3

-3

77

6:4

3

0

6.1

-9%

19

19

3

0

72

0:1

6

0

6.0

-6%

13

15

7

-2

74

1:2

3

0

5.8

0%

7

16

1

-9

34

1:2

0

0

4.0

-37%

Total

71

85

24

-14

348

12:11

16

0

5.7

-9%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Nuke Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke were stadodo, who contributed 24 kills, and rmn, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9106 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sangal on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Sangal, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sangal on Nuke included MAJ3R, who contributed 17 kills, and imoRR, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8015 total damage, Sangal couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date