Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

8

3

+13

91

2:1

5

1

7.8

+36%

14

13

7

+1

98

5:2

3

1

7.2

+10%

16

10

5

+6

85

4:0

4

0

7.1

+17%

13

10

2

+3

49

3:1

3

1

6.3

+1%

13

14

1

-1

68

2:1

3

0

5.9

-14%

Total

77

55

18

+22

391

16:5

18

3

6.9

+10%

Endpoint Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

14

3

+9

106

0:1

6

1

7.4

+21%

11

15

4

-4

71

2:2

2

0

5.5

+2%

10

14

4

-4

53

2:3

3

0

5.1

-17%

6

18

2

-12

45

1:5

1

0

3.7

-45%

5

16

2

-11

34

0:5

1

0

3.5

-42%

Total

55

77

15

-22

309

5:16

13

1

5.0

-16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis were Gafolo, who contributed 21 kills, and chay, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8205 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis included mhL, who contributed 23 kills, and MiGHTYMAX, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6487 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date