Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

15

7

+7

81

3:3

5

0

6.7

+7%

17

16

5

+1

75

2:2

5

1

6.4

-2%

18

13

3

+5

71

4:1

4

1

6.4

+3%

15

16

7

-1

76

3:4

4

0

6.0

+6%

15

15

6

0

61

1:3

4

1

5.8

-6%

Total

87

75

28

+12

365

13:13

22

3

6.3

+2%

Leviatan Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

16

3

+3

84

3:2

6

0

6.5

+4%

16

18

8

-2

79

4:3

3

1

6.3

-3%

16

19

4

-3

75

3:2

3

0

6.0

-6%

12

18

6

-6

52

0:1

1

1

5.0

-22%

10

19

2

-9

46

3:5

3

0

4.7

-28%

Total

73

90

23

-17

335

13:13

16

2

5.7

-11%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Leviatan by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno were Lucaozy, who contributed 22 kills, and chay, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9486 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Leviatan on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Leviatan, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Leviatan on Inferno included meyern, who contributed 19 kills, and reversive, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8716 total damage, Leviatan couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Leviatan struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date