Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

17

1

-3

79

4:1

2

1

6.5

-6%

12

14

4

-2

61

3:3

4

2

5.9

-12%

12

17

7

-5

69

1:0

1

0

5.6

-17%

10

15

0

-5

43

0:1

2

1

4.8

-30%

9

19

4

-10

65

3:4

1

0

4.8

-22%

Total

57

82

16

-25

317

11:9

10

4

5.5

-17%

Meta Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

11

3

+15

124

3:1

7

1

9.4

+43%

22

14

7

+8

127

3:3

5

0

8.1

+42%

15

10

3

+5

69

1:2

2

0

6.4

+10%

9

12

3

-3

60

1:4

1

0

5.0

-9%

9

12

2

-3

39

1:1

2

0

4.7

-21%

Total

81

59

18

+22

419

9:11

17

1

6.7

+13%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Meta by the Bo3.gg Team

Meta on Inferno Analysis

Meta demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Meta on Inferno were supLexN1, who contributed 26 kills, and CutzMeretz, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8387 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Meta held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 5 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included chay, who contributed 14 kills, and Gafolo, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6342 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Meta from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date