Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

23

11

5

+12

100

4:1

5

0

8.1

+30%

22

12

5

+10

96

3:0

5

1

7.9

+22%

15

15

0

0

62

3:2

3

0

5.9

+2%

12

12

4

0

58

2:1

2

0

5.7

-2%

11

15

6

-4

57

3:4

4

0

5.2

-16%

Total

83

65

20

+18

374

15:8

19

1

6.6

+7%

MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

13

1

+3

71

0:0

3

1

6.2

+3%

20

20

2

0

79

3:5

5

1

6.2

0%

10

18

6

-8

73

3:4

0

0

5.3

-26%

10

16

6

-6

57

1:3

1

0

4.9

-26%

8

17

2

-9

44

0:2

2

0

4.3

-34%

Total

64

84

17

-20

324

7:14

11

2

5.4

-17%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno were zevy, who contributed 23 kills, and Lucaozy, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8970 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno included WOOD7, who contributed 16 kills, and chelo, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7781 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date