Sharks Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

14

3

+2

101

5:3

5

0

7.4

+13%

11

13

5

-2

83

0:2

3

2

6.2

-3%

11

15

2

-4

66

0:2

3

1

5.5

-19%

7

16

4

-9

50

3:1

0

0

4.8

-32%

6

15

1

-9

43

1:0

1

1

4.6

-40%

Total

51

73

15

-22

343

9:8

12

4

5.7

-16%

paiN Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

12

2

+10

123

1:1

6

1

9.3

+52%

16

10

8

+6

111

1:0

5

0

7.6

+45%

15

9

3

+6

84

4:0

5

0

7.5

+20%

13

10

3

+3

72

1:3

3

1

6.5

+2%

6

13

5

-7

45

1:5

1

0

4.2

-36%

Total

72

54

21

+18

435

8:9

20

2

7.0

+17%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs paiN by the Bo3.gg Team

paiN on Anubis Analysis

paiN demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for paiN on Anubis were kauez, who contributed 22 kills, and nyezin, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7390 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Anubis included doczin, who contributed 16 kills, and rdnzao, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5825 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent paiN from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date