SINNERS Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

19

4

+5

104

3:3

6

0

7.3

+32%

17

17

4

0

82

6:3

5

1

6.5

0%

15

13

2

+2

55

2:1

4

1

5.8

-11%

7

16

3

-9

49

1:1

1

0

4.5

-29%

5

21

5

-16

35

1:4

0

0

3.6

-38%

Total

68

86

18

-18

325

13:12

16

2

5.5

-9%

BIG Academy Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

13

5

+8

99

5:4

6

0

7.0

+23%

21

15

4

+6

81

1:2

4

0

6.5

+10%

17

11

2

+6

79

3:2

5

0

6.4

+19%

14

15

3

-1

64

1:3

4

0

5.3

-4%

12

14

3

-2

52

2:2

2

0

5.2

-10%

Total

85

68

17

+17

375

12:13

21

0

6.1

+8%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs BIG Academy by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG Academy on Anubis Analysis

BIG Academy demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 15 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG Academy on Anubis were s1n, who contributed 21 kills, and prosus, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9376 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, BIG Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SINNERS on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 10 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SINNERS on Anubis included beastik, who contributed 24 kills, and ZEDKO, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8115 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent BIG Academy from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date