SINNERS Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

17

3

+3

81

1:4

4

0

6.3

-2%

19

19

4

0

72

5:3

4

0

6.3

-1%

18

17

3

+1

76

1:2

5

0

5.9

+2%

13

22

3

-9

66

3:3

1

0

5.2

-19%

9

21

5

-12

43

1:4

0

0

4.1

-36%

Total

79

96

18

-17

338

11:16

14

0

5.6

-11%

EC Kyiv Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

18

6

+2

85

4:4

5

2

7.1

+11%

24

13

7

+11

62

4:0

6

0

6.8

+8%

19

14

8

+5

89

3:3

4

0

6.7

+7%

18

15

3

+3

64

3:0

2

0

6.2

-2%

14

19

10

-5

72

2:4

5

0

5.5

-9%

Total

95

79

34

+16

372

16:11

22

2

6.5

+3%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Kyiv on Inferno Analysis

EC Kyiv demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Kyiv on Inferno were Smash, who contributed 20 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10057 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Kyiv held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SINNERS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno included FORSYY, who contributed 20 kills, and ZEDKO, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9126 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent EC Kyiv from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date