SINNERS Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

26

14

8

+12

96

1:2

8

0

7.5

+31%

23

20

10

+3

118

3:4

6

0

7.3

+24%

20

13

6

+7

80

7:0

6

0

7.3

+7%

19

15

5

+4

64

3:3

5

3

6.6

+6%

13

18

7

-5

63

0:2

3

1

5.3

0%

Total

101

80

36

+21

421

14:11

28

4

6.8

+14%

Sampi Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

21

3

-2

83

4:2

4

0

6.7

+1%

18

19

3

-1

68

1:1

5

1

6.1

-4%

14

20

3

-6

76

2:4

3

0

5.6

+5%

15

21

3

-6

73

1:4

3

0

5.3

-3%

11

21

3

-10

55

3:3

1

1

5.0

-26%

Total

77

102

15

-25

355

11:14

16

2

5.8

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team

SINNERS on Inferno Analysis

SINNERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno were Zero, who contributed 26 kills, and SHOCK, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10526 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sampi on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sampi, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sampi on Inferno included MATYS, who contributed 19 kills, and T4GG3D, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8867 total damage, Sampi couldn't prevent SINNERS from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date