SKADE Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

17

0

+9

92

6:3

8

0

7.1

+15%

20

14

3

+6

84

2:3

5

0

6.8

+9%

17

11

4

+6

73

1:1

6

0

6.2

+10%

12

14

5

-2

60

2:0

3

0

5.5

-13%

14

17

3

-3

59

3:5

4

0

5.1

-5%

Total

89

73

15

+16

368

14:12

26

0

6.1

+3%

BLINK Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

16

2

+4

75

4:1

4

0

6.4

+11%

17

18

5

-1

75

3:1

5

0

6.2

+4%

15

17

3

-2

66

2:2

5

1

5.7

0%

11

17

5

-6

58

1:2

3

0

4.9

-18%

10

21

3

-11

49

2:8

1

0

4.1

-27%

Total

73

89

18

-16

322

12:14

18

1

5.4

-6%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of SKADE vs BLINK by the Bo3.gg Team

SKADE on Nuke Analysis

SKADE demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SKADE on Nuke were SHiPZ, who contributed 26 kills, and Rainwaker, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9580 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SKADE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BLINK on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for BLINK, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BLINK on Nuke included BledarD, who contributed 20 kills, and Krabeni, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8384 total damage, BLINK couldn't prevent SKADE from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, BLINK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date