B4 Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

33

14

8

+19

113

5:2

10

0

8.6

+40%

24

20

2

+4

85

4:4

4

0

6.7

+15%

23

18

6

+5

88

0:2

7

0

6.5

+10%

15

21

13

-6

63

2:3

2

0

5.7

-12%

12

20

6

-8

59

3:3

4

0

5.1

-17%

Total

107

93

35

+14

407

14:14

27

0

6.5

+7%

SWS Scoreboard Dust II (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

23

1

-1

74

6:4

5

0

6.4

+3%

18

22

4

-4

81

3:0

4

0

6.2

+3%

21

22

2

-1

79

3:5

5

0

5.7

+1%

15

18

1

-3

65

1:2

3

0

5.5

+4%

17

22

5

-5

65

1:3

5

1

5.4

-14%

Total

93

107

13

-14

364

14:14

22

1

5.8

-1%

Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of B4 vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team

B4 on Dust II Analysis

B4 demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for B4 on Dust II were nqz, who contributed 33 kills, and realziN, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 11401 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, B4 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SWS on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for SWS, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SWS on Dust II included bsd, who contributed 22 kills, and CSO, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10191 total damage, SWS couldn't prevent B4 from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, SWS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date