TSM Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

9

8

+10

98

5:0

6

0

7.9

+30%

16

12

2

+4

80

5:4

3

1

6.7

+15%

14

12

8

+2

76

1:0

4

0

6.4

+12%

13

12

2

+1

67

4:1

3

0

6.2

-6%

14

14

3

0

73

1:0

3

0

5.8

+7%

Total

76

59

23

+17

395

16:5

19

1

6.6

+12%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

16

3

-2

76

2:4

4

1

6.5

-2%

14

14

4

0

76

1:2

2

0

6.1

-3%

13

15

4

-2

66

0:1

4

1

5.7

-3%

11

16

6

-5

77

1:6

4

0

4.9

-12%

7

16

2

-9

38

1:3

2

0

4.2

-37%

Total

59

77

19

-18

333

5:16

16

2

5.5

-11%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of TSM vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

TSM on Inferno Analysis

TSM demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for TSM on Inferno were valde, who contributed 19 kills, and CYPHER, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8302 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included simke, who contributed 14 kills, and brutmonster, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7002 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent TSM from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date