1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
10
2
13
14
15
3
0
TYLOO Scoreboard Mirage (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

4

4

+8

76

2:0

2

1

7.3

+20%

14

8

6

+6

111

1:1

1

0

7.3

+30%

12

5

3

+7

69

3:1

3

0

6.7

+24%

10

9

4

+1

75

3:2

2

0

6.2

+24%

Total

48

26

17

+22

332

9:4

8

1

6.9

+25%

GR Scoreboard Mirage (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

13

0

-4

57

1:2

3

1

5.6

-28%

8

14

4

-6

60

0:1

1

0

5.0

-13%

8

15

1

-7

55

2:3

1

0

4.7

-4%

3

14

1

-11

36

1:2

0

0

3.6

-42%

1

15

3

-14

29

0:3

0

0

2.6

-56%

Total

29

71

9

-42

238

4:11

5

1

4.3

-29%

Teams advantage Mirage (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of TYLOO vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team

TYLOO on Mirage Analysis

TYLOO demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for TYLOO on Mirage were JamYoung, who contributed 12 kills, and Mercury, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 4973 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GR on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for GR, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GR on Mirage included mediocrity, who contributed 9 kills, and qqGOD, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3567 total damage, GR couldn't prevent TYLOO from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, GR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date