Ukraine Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

9

5

+21

158

7:3

9

0

9.9

+86%

27

10

1

+17

112

5:0

9

0

8.8

+38%

13

8

3

+5

76

1:1

3

0

6.0

+21%

11

9

6

+2

61

1:0

2

0

5.7

+4%

10

6

4

+4

54

0:2

1

0

5.2

0%

Total

91

42

19

+49

461

14:6

24

0

7.1

+30%

Australia Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

18

3

-8

77

3:3

2

0

5.5

-17%

11

17

0

-6

61

0:2

2

0

5.0

-24%

7

20

3

-13

54

2:4

1

0

4.3

-34%

8

19

1

-11

50

1:4

1

0

4.0

-30%

5

17

2

-12

42

0:1

0

0

3.7

-43%

Total

41

91

9

-50

284

6:14

6

0

4.5

-30%

Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Ukraine vs Australia by the Bo3.gg Team

Ukraine on Ancient Analysis

Ukraine demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Ukraine on Ancient were kensizor, who contributed 30 kills, and Kvem, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9220 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, Ukraine held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Australia on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Australia, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Australia on Ancient included Liki, who contributed 10 kills, and SaVage, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5677 total damage, Australia couldn't prevent Ukraine from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, Australia struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date