Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

21

4

+3

92

4:3

6

0

6.7

+18%

17

20

2

-3

76

3:5

3

0

5.8

-4%

12

20

5

-8

61

1:2

1

0

5.0

-14%

13

18

3

-5

46

3:5

1

1

4.9

-24%

11

18

4

-7

47

1:1

1

1

4.8

-33%

Total

77

97

18

-20

321

12:16

12

2

5.5

-11%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

11

3

+13

74

2:2

4

2

7.1

+20%

18

17

4

+1

78

5:2

5

1

6.4

-2%

19

17

9

+2

90

3:5

5

0

6.3

+5%

19

17

3

+2

69

4:1

6

0

6.3

+5%

17

17

8

0

64

2:2

3

0

5.7

+4%

Total

97

79

27

+18

375

16:12

23

3

6.4

+6%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Virtus.pro vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

BIG on Inferno Analysis

BIG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno were syrsoN, who contributed 24 kills, and XANTARES, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10491 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Virtus.pro, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno included Qikert, who contributed 24 kills, and buster, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8989 total damage, Virtus.pro couldn't prevent BIG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date