Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

16

4

+8

79

4:1

7

2

7.3

+6%

23

16

5

+7

80

5:1

6

0

7.1

+13%

20

19

10

+1

84

4:6

5

0

5.9

+2%

18

18

2

0

65

2:2

4

0

5.7

-2%

15

15

2

0

61

1:4

2

0

5.3

-7%

Total

100

84

23

+16

369

16:14

24

2

6.2

+2%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

18

3

+3

92

3:2

6

1

6.7

+8%

24

19

3

+5

86

3:3

7

0

6.6

+8%

13

22

6

-9

58

3:1

3

0

5.0

-16%

13

21

5

-8

59

3:7

2

0

4.8

-18%

12

21

3

-9

42

2:3

3

0

4.7

-28%

Total

83

101

20

-18

337

14:16

21

1

5.6

-9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Virtus.pro vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Virtus.pro demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno were Jame, who contributed 24 kills, and buster, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11066 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


fnatic on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for fnatic, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno included Brollan, who contributed 21 kills, and KRIMZ, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10101 total damage, fnatic couldn't prevent Virtus.pro from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date