Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

8

7

+9

121

3:1

4

1

9.0

+50%

15

8

6

+7

110

3:4

4

0

8.0

+38%

13

8

4

+5

98

2:0

5

0

7.7

+32%

14

7

3

+7

79

1:0

3

1

7.7

+31%

8

6

2

+2

48

0:1

2

0

5.6

-8%

Total

67

37

22

+30

455

9:6

18

2

7.6

+28%

Amigosi Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

13

2

-3

74

3:1

2

0

5.9

+2%

9

12

4

-3

73

0:2

2

1

5.3

+4%

7

15

6

-8

67

0:1

1

0

4.6

-24%

7

14

0

-7

52

1:3

1

0

4.4

-7%

4

13

3

-9

38

2:2

1

0

4.0

-9%

Total

37

67

15

-30

304

6:9

7

1

4.8

-7%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Amigosi by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were simke, who contributed 17 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6830 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Amigosi on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Amigosi, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Amigosi on Anubis included fanatic, who contributed 10 kills, and gagi, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4565 total damage, Amigosi couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Amigosi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date