Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

2

+2

98

3:1

4

1

7.0

+15%

14

14

8

0

86

1:1

3

0

6.3

+10%

13

16

2

-3

52

5:3

4

0

5.6

-21%

11

19

4

-8

69

2:2

3

0

5.5

-20%

9

18

2

-9

50

2:1

1

0

4.9

-31%

Total

65

83

18

-18

354

13:8

15

1

5.9

-9%

Sangal Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

29

9

5

+20

129

1:2

9

0

9.2

+78%

14

13

4

+1

81

4:3

1

0

6.3

+6%

15

13

3

+2

69

0:2

2

0

5.9

-4%

14

16

3

-2

76

1:2

3

0

5.6

+1%

11

14

7

-3

68

2:4

4

1

5.4

-3%

Total

83

65

22

+18

422

8:13

19

1

6.5

+16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Anubis Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Anubis were sausol, who contributed 29 kills, and PANIX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8864 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included nEMANHA, who contributed 18 kills, and aVN, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7443 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date