Enterprise Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

20

3

-5

71

4:5

3

2

6.0

-12%

11

15

8

-4

57

1:2

2

1

5.4

-22%

16

19

0

-3

64

1:4

5

0

5.2

-11%

12

19

1

-7

56

1:2

2

0

5.0

-22%

9

24

3

-15

49

2:3

2

0

4.2

-32%

Total

63

97

15

-34

297

9:16

14

3

5.2

-20%

eSuba Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

11

4

+10

87

4:2

6

1

7.3

+33%

22

15

7

+7

102

3:3

4

0

7.0

+43%

22

15

4

+7

93

5:3

5

0

6.9

+26%

16

10

8

+6

69

0:1

5

1

6.3

+12%

16

12

3

+4

62

4:0

3

0

6.2

0%

Total

97

63

26

+34

414

16:9

23

2

6.7

+23%

Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Enterprise vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

eSuba on Ancient Analysis

eSuba demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for eSuba on Ancient were sAvana1, who contributed 21 kills, and luko, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 10352 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, eSuba held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Enterprise on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Enterprise, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Enterprise on Ancient included MATYS, who contributed 15 kills, and FORSYY, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7429 total damage, Enterprise couldn't prevent eSuba from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date