Enterprise Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

10

3

+17

110

7:3

7

0

8.1

+38%

21

16

3

+5

87

5:1

7

0

7.1

+15%

17

17

5

0

72

5:3

4

0

6.0

0%

19

16

3

+3

67

0:0

4

0

6.0

+13%

9

15

3

-6

28

1:3

0

0

4.2

-31%

Total

93

74

17

+19

365

18:10

22

0

6.3

+7%

eSuba Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

17

3

+6

86

2:3

8

1

6.7

+19%

15

18

3

-3

66

7:7

4

0

5.7

-10%

12

20

4

-8

63

0:1

3

0

4.9

-9%

13

19

2

-6

55

1:4

2

0

4.8

-14%

10

20

3

-10

38

0:3

4

0

4.1

-31%

Total

73

94

15

-21

308

10:18

21

1

5.3

-9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Enterprise vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team

Enterprise on Inferno Analysis

Enterprise demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Enterprise on Inferno were FORSYY, who contributed 27 kills, and manguss, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10225 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Enterprise held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


eSuba on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for eSuba, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for eSuba on Inferno included twist, who contributed 23 kills, and Blogg1s, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8631 total damage, eSuba couldn't prevent Enterprise from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date