G2 Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

21

13

4

+8

78

2:0

4

1

6.9

+18%

20

16

5

+4

75

2:3

5

0

6.1

-4%

18

18

8

0

66

3:2

4

0

6.1

+12%

18

14

6

+4

77

3:7

4

0

5.7

+4%

16

17

7

-1

78

2:3

2

0

5.7

-11%

Total

93

78

30

+15

373

12:15

19

1

6.1

+4%

BIG Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

16

4

+1

68

5:1

6

1

6.3

-4%

20

22

4

-2

83

5:4

5

0

6.3

-4%

17

17

2

0

73

2:1

4

0

6.0

-1%

14

19

2

-5

54

0:0

2

1

5.2

-21%

9

20

5

-11

52

3:6

2

0

4.5

-26%

Total

77

94

17

-17

331

15:12

19

2

5.7

-11%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Anubis Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 15 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Anubis were jks, who contributed 21 kills, and m0NESY, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10063 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 12 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Anubis included syrsoN, who contributed 17 kills, and tabseN, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8928 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date