G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

21

17

3

+4

104

4:2

5

1

7.9

+7%

21

13

4

+8

81

3:2

5

1

7.1

+7%

19

13

1

+6

76

1:0

6

0

6.7

+9%

15

15

3

0

73

2:0

3

0

6.2

0%

15

18

7

-3

76

2:8

4

1

5.9

+11%

Total

91

76

18

+15

410

12:12

23

3

6.7

+7%

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

14

3

+4

69

3:2

4

0

6.5

+2%

16

18

5

-2

79

2:4

2

1

6.0

+3%

16

19

6

-3

72

2:1

3

0

6.0

-10%

16

18

2

-2

57

1:4

5

1

5.4

-12%

10

22

8

-12

65

4:1

1

0

5.4

-31%

Total

76

91

24

-15

343

12:12

15

2

5.9

-10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of G2 vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were NiKo, who contributed 21 kills, and m0NESY, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9850 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included syrsoN, who contributed 18 kills, and k1to, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8230 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date