Passion UA Tablica wyników

+/-

WYNIK MAP

88

57

30

+31

119

9:5

24

1

Ancient10

8.5

+41%

75

53

9

+22

106

16:10

20

3

Ancient9.5

8.1

+29%

75

55

17

+20

94

10:6

20

5

Ancient9.2

8.0

+24%

58

55

19

+3

67

8:3

16

6

Ancient8

6.9

+6%

19

15

5

+4

89

4:4

5

0

Inferno6.5

6.5

+10%

14

15

6

-1

83

5:0

2

0

Inferno6.5

6.5

+4%

19

15

6

+4

74

0:3

5

0

Inferno6

6.0

+2%

13

15

3

-2

48

3:2

4

0

Inferno5.4

5.4

-10%

10

14

1

-4

53

1:1

1

1

Inferno5.2

5.2

0%

10

14

2

-4

51

1:1

1

1

Inferno5.2

5.2

-1%

10

41

16

-31

30

0:6

3

6

Ancient4.9

4.9

-37%

Ogółeml

391

349

114

+42

814

57:41

101

23

Ancient6.9

6.5

+6%

BLEED Tablica wyników

+/-

WYNIK MAP

22

12

4

+10

97

5:1

5

0

Inferno7.7

8.0

+18%

10

17

5

-7

56

1:2

2

0

Inferno5

6.7

-15%

18

14

3

+4

76

0:1

6

1

Inferno6.4

6.5

+3%

12

19

7

-7

74

4:6

2

0

Inferno5.6

6.5

-4%

11

13

5

-2

43

0:3

1

0

Inferno4.8

6.2

-15%

Ogółeml

73

75

24

-2

347

10:13

16

1

Inferno5.9

6.8

-3%

Przewaga drużyn

Mapy

Wynik

6.7

6.7

Inferno0

Wygrane rundy

37

36

Inferno0

Zabójstwa

224

218

Inferno0

Obrażenia

24.84K

24.16K

Inferno0

Ekonomia

1.58M

1.27M

Inferno0

RekordyMecz

Rekord/Czas/Mapa

W/Ś

Ustaw według

Rywal

Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)

  •  Inferno

18.34.7

Obrażenia od koktajla Mołotowa (śr./runda)

  •  Inferno

6.32

Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie

  •  Inferno

4.3751.8161

Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)

  •  Inferno

19.55.7

Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie

  •  Anubis

51.8161

Szybka Runda (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:35s01:54s

Strzały w głowę (total/map)

  •  Ancient

268

Strzały w głowę (total/map)

  •  Ancient

248

Strzały w głowę (total/map)

  •  Ancient

268

Strzały w głowę (total/map)

  •  Ancient

328

Składy
Skład
Wybory i zakazy
Overpass
Overpass
zakaz
Nuke
Nuke
zakaz
Inferno
Inferno
wybór
Ancient
Ancient
wybór
Vertigo
Vertigo
zakaz
Mirage
Mirage
zakaz
Anubis
Anubis
decydujący
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy

Inferno

80%

Vertigo

75%

Ancient

62%

Anubis

24%

Mirage

12%

Overpass

0%

Nuke

0%

Ostatnie 5 map

Inferno

0%

1

3

fb

Vertigo

25%

4

3

l
w

Ancient

62%

13

0

w
w
l
w
w

Anubis

43%

7

0

l
w
w
w

Mirage

38%

8

1

l
w
w
w

Overpass

100%

2

5

w
w

Nuke

0%

0

9

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Ostatnie 5 map

Inferno

80%

5

0

w
w
w
l

Vertigo

100%

1

5

fb
w

Ancient

0%

3

2

fb
l
l

Anubis

67%

3

4

fb
fb
fb
w
l

Mirage

50%

4

0

l
l
w
w

Overpass

100%

1

5

w
fb

Nuke

0%

0

2

fb
fb
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Te drużyny nie spotkały się w ciągu ostatnich 6 miesięcy
Poprzednie mecze
Informacja
Match analysis of Passion UA vs BLEED by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Passion UA and BLEED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by BLEED. The MVP of this match was s-chilla.


BLEED analytics

The team BLEED secured 40 out of 76 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Anubis. They also successfully set 15 bombs during the match.


The standout players for BLEED were hampus contributed 22 kills and faveN contributed 10 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8319 overall damage.


On the defensive side, BLEED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Passion UA analytics

The team Passion UA managed to secure 36 out of 76 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Passion UA were s-chilla contributed 88 kills and Jambo contributed 75 kills. 43006 of total damage by Passion UA could not prevent BLEED from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Passion UA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty